In most documentaries, it explains different sides of their own stories. In Beware of Mr. Baker, it discusses the real life of rockstar drummer, Ginger Baker. Meanwhile, Winning Time: Reggie Miller v. The New York Knicks is about the never ending rivalry between the Indiana Pacers and the New York Knicks. While both documentaries have the same interviewing techniques and shots, the differences, such as the present time filming of their subjects, made each documentary unique in their own way.
Throughout Beware of Mr. Baker, they interviewed a variety of different people. In interviewing, they made sure to ask questions about their interaction with Ginger Baker. The interviewers selected different people that had a relationship with the rockstar once before, such as his previous wives and musicians like Mick Jagger. Each question that was asked had a story, which made the documentary very insightful. In Winning Time: Reggie Miller v. The New York Knicks, filmmakers included every player that was involved in the 1992 and 1993 playoff series. For instance, they interviewed John Starks, Patrick Ewing, and Spike Lee on their feud during this time. Each interview reflected on their past experiences with Miller. In both documentaries, each technique allowed for the interviewees to reflect on their own past experiences and have their story heard.
When you interview for documentaries, you have to have a specific shot. In both Beware of Mr Baker and Winning Time: Reggie Miller v. The New York Knicks, all interviews had a medium close up shot; by using this shot, it allows the viewer to see all the nonverbal cues that the interviewee makes. For instance, when John Starks was reflecting his rivalry with Miller, you can tell by his facial expressions how infuriated he was. When you are interviewing, the words the interviewee says aren’t the most important thing, their body language can tell its own story.
Although both documentaries have a lot of similarities, the main difference was the storytelling in present day time. In Beware of Mr. Baker, the filmmakers made sure to follow up with Ginger Baker to see how his life is now. They showed his current wife, house, and life. Although they did reflect on his past life, similar to Reggie Miller in Winning Time, half of the documentary focused on his current life. This is significant because the difference allowed the documentary to tell a different story. While Ginger Baker reflected on his past experiences, Reggie Miller didn’t have that opportunity.
In conclusion, the differences, such as filming with Ginger Baker in the film in present day, and similarities, such as interviewing techniques and shots, in both documentaries made each film special in their own way. In the documentaries, Beware of Mr. Baker and Winning Time: Reggie Miller v. The New York Knicks, their originality forms a film that allows the audience to be captivated to the person’s story.